Large-scale replication · 2015
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration. Science, 349(6251).
Why independent replication and cumulative evidence matter.The evidence shelf
Foundational studies, reviews, syntheses, and open educational sources used across Mind Atlas. Each article explains what a source supports.
Large-scale replication · 2015
Open Science Collaboration. Science, 349(6251).
Why independent replication and cumulative evidence matter.Foundational review · 1974
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.. Science, 185(4157).
Foundational demonstrations of anchoring, availability, and representativeness.Theory · 1979
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.. Econometrica, 47(2).
Reference dependence and asymmetric evaluation of gains and losses.Experiment · 2006
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D.. Psychological Science, 17(3).
Retrieval practice and delayed retention.Meta-analysis · 2006
Cepeda, N. J., et al.. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3).
The spacing effect and the importance of the retention interval.Experiment · 1974
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C.. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5).
How post-event wording can influence memory reports.Review · 2014
Hagger, M. S., & Luszczynska, A.. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(1).
Qualified practical discussion of cues, plans, and behavior change.Open textbook · n.d.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (eds.). Noba Project.
Accessible background across cognition, learning, social psychology, and research methods.Meta-analysis · 1998
Kühberger, A.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1).
Shows that risky-choice framing varies with problem and design characteristics.Experiments · 1985
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1).
Foundational experiments on prior investment and continued commitment.Experiments · 1999
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6).
The original performance and self-assessment studies associated with the Dunning–Kruger effect.Methodological critique · 2020
Gignac, G. E., & Zajenkowski, M.. Intelligence, 80.
Tests how regression, measurement error, and analytical choices can produce the familiar pattern.Review · 2005
Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A.. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1).
Reviews what change-blindness findings do and do not imply about visual representation.Systematic review and meta-analysis · 2022
Matias, J., et al.. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(10).
Examines how different forms of task load relate to failures to notice unexpected stimuli.Experiments · 1935
Stroop, J. R.. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6).
The foundational color–word interference experiments.Review · 2012
Wagemans, J., et al.. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6).
Modern review of grouping, contour integration, and figure–ground organization.Review · 2012
Baddeley, A.. Annual Review of Psychology, 63.
Reviews competing models and evidence about temporary storage and control.Experiment · 1962
Murdock, B. B.. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5).
Classic evidence on primacy and recency across list conditions.Theoretical review · 1988
Rescorla, R. A.. American Psychologist, 43(3).
Explains conditioning as learning about predictive relationships rather than simple pairing.Experiment · 1961
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A.. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3).
Foundational evidence that observed models can influence later behavior.Meta-analysis · 1996
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B.. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1).
Shows that conformity estimates vary across time, cultures, and study features.Meta-analysis · 2011
Fischer, P., et al.. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4).
Finds an overall bystander effect alongside important moderation by danger and available support.Meta-analysis · 1983
Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J.. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2).
Synthesizes how the presence of others relates to performance across task conditions.Meta-analysis · 1993
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4).
Examines reduced individual effort in collective work and its moderators.Meta-analysis · 2012
Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P.. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4).
Compares emotional outcomes across regulation strategies and identifies moderators.Meta-analysis · 2012
Ng, J. Y. Y., et al.. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4).
Synthesizes relationships among autonomy support, motivation, and health-related outcomes.Meta-analysis · 2007
Steel, P.. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1).
Synthesizes correlates and proposed mechanisms of procrastination.Longitudinal field study · 2010
Lally, P., et al.. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6).
Tracks the growth of behavioral automaticity during repeated daily actions.Review · 2005
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T.. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3).
Reviews impact bias, focalism, adaptation, and implications for decisions.Meta-analysis · 2018
Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J.. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2).
Synthesizes comparison direction, motives, and individual differences.Meta-analytic review · 2023
de Sanctis, F., & Mesurado, B.. International Journal of Psychological Research, 15(2).
Synthesizes associations between measured attachment patterns and empathy while noting heterogeneity.Meta-analysis · 1989
Bornstein, R. F.. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2).
Synthesizes conditions under which repeated exposure changes liking.Experiments · 2000
Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2).
Tests estimates of how much observers notice one’s appearance and behavior.Experiments · 1998
Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2).
Tests how people estimate the visibility of their internal states.Classroom experiment · 1949
Forer, B. R.. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1).
The classic demonstration of accepting a generic personality description as personal.Review · 2015
Wager, T. D., & Atlas, L. Y.. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16.
Reviews how expectations, learning, and treatment context can influence symptoms and physiology.Experiments · 1993
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1).
Tests how peaks, endings, and duration contribute to remembered evaluations.Methods tutorial · 2013
Lakens, D.. Frontiers in Psychology, 4.
Explains why magnitude and its interpretation matter beyond statistical significance.Meta-research · 2012
Ferguson, C. J., & Brannick, M. T.. Psychological Methods, 17(1).
Reviews the prevalence and limitations of methods used to detect publication bias.Review · 2022
Nosek, B. A., et al.. Annual Review of Psychology, 73.
Distinguishes replication, robustness, reproducibility, and generalizability.